The Hill — A measure to reform the way Ohio draws its congressional district lines has cleared a key procedural hurdle, likely setting up a ballot initiative in next year’s midterm elections.
The Ohio Ballot Board, headed by Secretary of State Jon Husted (R), gave formal approval to language that would appear alongside the initiative. That gives supporters the ability to begin collecting signatures to place the initiative on the ballot.
But those backers are not optimistic that they can collect the 305,591 valid signatures required to get the measure on the ballot this year. They would have to collect those signatures by July 5, just five weeks from now.
Ohio rules require supporters to gather signatures from half of the state’s 88 counties. They must collect a number of signatures equal to 5 percent of the total number of votes cast in the last gubernatorial election in each of those 44 counties.
While backers aren’t optimistic about their chances this year, the Ballot Board’s decision to ratify language gives redistricting reformers the chance to get a head start on collecting signatures ahead of next year’s deadline.
Chicago Mag — It’s still one of the few remaining items on Bruce Rauner’s Turnaround Agenda, and arguably the most popular. If you go by public polling numbers, Illinois is more than ready to turn over the process of redistricting—which has been a subject of political struggle for the past 140-plus years—to a nonpartisan arbiter. Last year, the Paul Simon Institute at SIU found that seventy-two percent of respondents favor an independent redistricting commission.
Perhaps this sentiment is related to the budget impasse and the state’s long slide into fiscal oblivion, but not necessarily; redistricting is popular across states and time periods. A 2013 Harris poll found that 50 percent of Americans favored independent state commissions, with the rest divided among five other categories and just 14 percent in favor of lawmakers redoing the lines. Gerrymandering (when lawmakers draw districts to favor their own party) has become such a national problem that it was even the subject of a popular Last Week Tonight episode, garnering more than 5 million views on YouTube.
Last year Illinois lawmakers tried to reform its redistricting process, but failed. It came down to a heated 4-3 division on the Illinois Supreme Court, in which the Democratic majority judged that the redistricting initiative overreached; lawmakers could modify the “structure and procedure” of the legislature but not non-legislative offices like the auditor and state Supreme Court.
Basically, the state auditor would play a small administrative role in redistricting, and the Supreme Court could play a big one, by choosing someone to redraw the map in the event the independent commission couldn’t pick one. These procedural matters might be minor or unlikely, but it was enough to derail what had already been an uphill battle to get a ballot measure passed.
Political support, from both the masses and the powerful interests that supported the ballot measure, made it possible to push the widespread (if somewhat apathetic) support of such an effort. Doing it twice is a lot to ask, but the support for it is unlikely to change. If so, there’s an appealing option sitting on the shelf: a plan from the Illinois state representative-slash-Fermilab researcher Mike Fortner that I wrote about in 2013.